The
UK will be provided with a wealth of information about companies and
individuals registered in well-known tax havens after nine more
countries signed up to international tax protocols.
Austria,
Luxembourg and Singapore,
a traditionally secretive banking jurisdiction, were among the
countries adding their names to a list of more than 50 countries who
have agreed to automatically exchange tax information, help foreign
nations to clamp down on tax debtors and allow countries to conduct
wide-ranging joint multiparty tax investigations.
The
Austrian finance minister, Maria Fekter, hailed the news, announced
at the OECD ministerial meeting in Paris, as a "huge step
forward" for her country.
She
said that signing the OECD's multilateral convention on mutual
administrative assistance on tax matters would "increase
Austria's ability to actively contribute to the current international
effort to [tackle tax] base erosion and profit shifting".
After
many decades of banking secrecy which have allowed foreign account
holders to veil their assets, Fekter said "recent developments"
had persuaded Austria of "the importance of such cross-border
co-operation in order to minimise the opportunity for international
tax
avoidance and
evasion".
Less
than a month ago, Fekter branded the UK and its overseas territories
as " the island of the blessed for tax evasion and money laundering"
and
called for a registry for disclosing the beneficiaries of trusts.
On
Wednesday, without naming the UK specifically, Fekter repeated her
call for more information about the true beneficiaries of hundreds of
billions of assets, saying: "We should not only focus on …
access to bank information but also for the disclosure of beneficial
ownership and beneficiaries of corporations and trusts and similar
entities in general."
However,
Singapore's deputy prime minister, Tharman Shanmugaratnam, said UK
overseas territories needed to come on board to ensure the convention
functioned properly: "Signing the convention reflects
Singapore's commitment to tax co-operation based on international
standards, but the standards can only work if all financial centres
come on board. Singapore will work with international partners to
achieve that, so that … offshore jurisdictions like the British
Overseas Territories move together."
The
new tax protocols will also affect entities based in Luxembourg such
as Amazon and will eventually allow for faster transmission of data
to HM Revenue and Customs and other tax authorities around the world.
Amazon
continues to face questions about its company structures after it was
revealed that it
pays
meagre amounts of tax in the UK on sales
of up to £4.2bn.
The
OECD secretary general, Ángel Gurría, said that rewriting
international tax rules had become one of the great challenges for
finance ministers as many of the old frameworks had become
irrelevant.
"The
[international tax] rules which we have built since the 1920s were
meant to avoid double taxation … the problem is we've moved from
double taxation to double non-taxation.
"Now
we don't tax anybody because we've built a set of codes and
regulations and law … and culture … where we facilitate the fact
that co-operations, through transfer pricing practises, put their
profits in low-tax jurisdictions and therefore do not pay what would
be considered to be their fair share."
He
said that taxing IT companies such as Google and Amazon had become
especially difficult as they were based in the "ether".
"You
can move anywhere and it doesn't matter where you originate the
information or where you register the company, basically the
consistency is that they [the companies] want to pay less tax."
Gurría,
who works closely with finance minsters in dozens of countries, spoke
frankly about how the financial crises had precipitated a new era of
tax co-operation.
Pushed
by the G20, he said, the OECD had "made more progress in three
years than in the 10 years before" in getting its member
countries and others to sign up.
"This
[work] is not against the corporations. We want to make sure the
corporations have legal certainty, that they know they are not going
to be double taxed or multiple taxed, but at the same time, it is
appropriate they produce their fair share for society, especially at
a time of very tight budgets where ministers are having to increase
the taxes and are having to cut expenses."
He
said taxing the "man on the street" wasn't economically
desirable or even politically possible, so for many finance ministers
the only option was "to cut, cut, cut more, rather than have a
proper balance between revenue and the expense".